|
Brecker Clients
|
|
Clients obtain excellent results from our Value, Quality, and Productivity improvement workshops. Non-disclosure agreements and professional ethics prevent us from discussing specific clients and product and process improvements. However, we can share some generalized results. Six Sigma Value Analysis workshops on specific products and processes have been particularly successful. These workshops concentrate on eliminating quality problems to reduce costs. Materials costs and productivity issues are addressed as needed. The focus of individual workshops varies according to the specific product and processes. Our Six Sigma Leaders training involves working on a major business process. Six Sigma Leader candidates work on coordinated projects. The results are significant improvements in a key business process. Training that produces results. Re-engineering identifies key business processes and aligns process improvement projects to strategic and financial objectives. A major portion of the business or department is usually involved. Work processes are analyzed and non-value adding activities are eliminated. A significant re-alignment of work responsibilities usually results. Cost ReductionA manufacturing client has used Six Sigma Value Analysis Workshops
Similar Process Improvement workshops reduce costs in service businesses and administrative processes. Process ImprovementUnder construction
Also see Re-engineering below. Six Sigma LeadersUnder construction
Re-engineering
Brecker Associates helped
An in-depth re-engineering of this shared-ride system was undertaken to
The Brecker Six Sigma Improvement Methodology was applied to re-engineer the paratransit system. In Phase 1, customer needs (riders and social service agencies) were determined from focus groups, surveys, and market research. An activity-Based Costing survey was used to evaluate the value of employee activities. Process performance was measured in detail for a one-week sample period. A multi-functional team identified and prioritized quality and productivity issues in Phase 2. Potential solutions were developed, quantified, and prioritized. In Phase 3, teams re-designed the key reservations and scheduling processes. Process changes were tested, improved, and implemented in Phase 4. Measurements to monitor system performance were set in place.
The re-engineering process produced these excellent results:
This quantitative approach to performance improvement
|